194: The Genome Odyssey: Medical Mysteries and the Incredible Quest to Solve Them

 

Synopsis

In The Genome Odyssey, Dr. Euan Ashley, Stanford professor of medicine and genetics, brings the breakthroughs of precision medicine to vivid life through the real diagnostic journeys of his patients and the tireless efforts of his fellow doctors and scientists as they hunt to prevent, predict, and beat disease.

Since the Human Genome Project was completed in 2003, the price of genome sequencing has dropped at a staggering rate. It’s as if the price of a Ferrari went from $350,000 to a mere forty cents. Through breakthroughs made by Dr. Ashley’s team at Stanford and other dedicated groups around the world, analyzing the human genome has decreased from a heroic multibillion dollar effort to a single clinical test costing less than $1,000.

For the first time we have within our grasp the ability to predict our genetic future, to diagnose and prevent disease before it begins, and to decode what it really means to be human.

In The Genome Odyssey, Dr. Ashley details the medicine behind genome sequencing with clarity and accessibility. More than that, with passion for his subject and compassion for his patients, he introduces readers to the dynamic group of researchers and doctor detectives who hunt for answers, and to the pioneering patients who open up their lives to the medical community during their search for diagnoses and cures.

He describes how he led the team that was the first to analyze and interpret a complete human genome, how they broke genome speed records to diagnose and treat a newborn baby girl whose heart stopped five times on the first day of her life, and how they found a boy with tumors growing inside his heart and traced the cause to a missing piece of his genome.

These patients inspire Dr. Ashley and his team as they work to expand the boundaries of our medical capabilities and to envision a future where genome sequencing is available for all, where medicine can be tailored to treat specific diseases and to decode pathogens like viruses at the genomic level, and where our medical system as we know it has been completely revolutionized.

The Good

~Forward advancement of genomes (and science) is exciting to read about- it seems incredibly revolutionary.

~Surprised how current it was- it talks about COVID-19 and its connection to genome science.

~If you are into rare diseases this probably would be a good book to get into since it goes into many patients with rare diseases. 

~Although, science is overwhelming in its complexity it is still interesting.

The Bad

So I am not into the technical side of science thus meaning the really specific terms and stuff is not for me. Generally,  a lot of the story was not my bag for so to speak but I do not think it is objectively poorly written. 

It did bother me a bit the introductions of different medical professionals throughout the book- some of (a lot?) of the describing of the professionals personalities sounded the same. 

Thoughts

There is a push to streamline drugs/deal with the effects instead of  the cause without exploration of people’s biology? 

I received this from Celadon Books in exchange for my review

(the cover image and synopsis is from goodreads)

197: Chlorine Sky

Synopsis

A novel-in-verse about a young girl coming-of-age and stepping out of the shadow of her former best friend. Perfect for readers of Elizabeth Acevedo and Nikki Grimes.

She looks me hard in my eyes
& my knees lock into tree trunks
My eyes don’t dance like my heartbeat racing
They stare straight back hot daggers.
I remember things will never be the same.
I remember things.

With gritty and heartbreaking honesty, Mahogany L. Browne delivers a novel-in-verse about broken promises, fast rumors, and when growing up means growing apart from your best friend.

The Good

~Classicism

~Colorism 

~Misogynoir/sexism

~It captures that teenage time period well – at a point I felt this would be really good for its target audience teens. 

A. It shows flawed, toxic, and positive relationships that are not limited to just the romantic variety. 

B. It felt like it was in the thick of teenagehood- many stories in ya now feel like they are constantly at the end. 

The Bad

~Felt like I was fighting to get into into the verse- I am noticing this a lot with the new in verse stories that are coming out they are just not hitting. 

~Mixing up people? I am sure it is probably an editing thing but there was mixing up of people (or is it intended to be that way?)

The Meh 

~Everything was not magically solved in the end which is a positive but does it feel unresolved in the end?

 

I won this arc from a goodreads giveaway by Crown Books For Young Readers

(the cover image and synopsis is from goodreads)

198: Never Enough: A Navy Seal Commander on Living a Life of Excellence, Agility, and Meaning

 

Synopsis

In Never Enough, Mike Hayes–former Commander of SEAL Team TWO–helps readers apply high-stakes lessons about excellence, agility, and meaning across their personal and professional lives.

 

Mike Hayes has lived a lifetime of once-in-a-lifetime experiences. He has been held at gunpoint and threatened with execution. He’s jumped out of a building rigged to explode, helped amputate a teammate’s leg, and made countless split-second life-and-death decisions. He’s written countless emails to his family, telling them how much he loves them, just in case those were the last words of his they’d ever read. Outside of the SEALs, he’s run meetings in the White House Situation Room, negotiated international arms treaties, and developed high-impact corporate strategies.

Over his many years of leadership, he has always strived to be better, to contribute more, and to put others first. That’s what makes him an effective leader, and it’s the quality that he’s identified in all of the great leaders he’s encountered. That continual striving to lift those around him has filled Mike’s life with meaning and purpose, has made him secure in the knowledge that he brings his best to everything he does, and has made him someone others can rely on.

In Never Enough, Mike Hayes recounts dramatic stories and offers battle- and boardroom-tested advice that will motivate readers to do work of value, live lives of purpose, and stretch themselves to reach their highest potential.

The Good

Already, it has made me come at certain situations differently.

My favorite chapter was when it got to meaning because it hit me the most.

Ideas found interesting= 

Being committed to old traditions is a negative when it is going against what would get the best results.

Creating a environment where the “lowest” member can do the job of the “highest” member.

Is the punishment being dulled out about ego instead of creating room for actual change?

The Bad

Repetitive- many points  felt like they were getting repeated.

Are the ideals revolutionary enough? Are the ideals explained thoroughly enough? Is there enough depth given to some of the ideals? Is it full of right answers and not messy enough?

Things got a bit (a lot) ugh when it got into some moments about military work done on Afghanistan…

The Meh 

It is very military centric- that is not my bag generally.

Is promoting big business>self.  Most of Never Enough is ideals is based around the military so it is understandable why this is focused the way it is in terms of collective over individual. 

Good= ideally wise it is something that needs to implemented more the collective working to benefit the collective. In general pushing for the betterment of everyone is a good sentiment. 

Bad= this ideal of family/community/etc over individual does not work because businesses care for the money and select few/one over everyone while putting façade of being for everyone. 

Putting logic over emotion.

Good= there is this aspect of emotion getting in the way of handling  issues. 

Bad= makes sense for a business/military because there is a bottom line sacrifice aspect to both that is messy.  One of my thoughts reading this is there is a emotion crisis so to speak- we are pushed constantly to move like robots without addressing our emotional needs. 

Choosing the hard path= this turned me off at first because I think it can feed into to this bad ideology that if you are not practically taking yourself out to overachieve so that your life as a being can be seen as meaningful that your life is without meaningless. Many people do not work hard their hardest, put their emotional health in jeopardy, or  put collectives/big business over themselves because they are seen as disposable. 

Self-help can feel braggy? Maybe this connects to the it is not messy enough thing.

 

I received this from Celadon Books in exchange for my review

(the cover image and synopsis is from goodreads)